RE:RE:Why is Nano One moving and not HPQ?i THINK I know the answer:
Bernard has gto get some training from Santa.
Santa always delivers.
Bernard does not know the address of the major auto manufacturer.
But Delivery is Imminent! Delivery imminent.
rawdeal wrote: Good4You wrote: Can someone please tell me the difference between these two promising products in the EV batteries sector, and why having two Co in the process of delivering their first samples at about the same time to one major auto maker, NNO has Moved UP 20% Friday and 25% today, while HPQ seems almost stagnant. Is it a marketing or promotion problem? Or is one Product offers better possibilities than the other? Really I would appreciate your comments. Thanks HPQ Patient, Long and Strong Good4You
I posted a couple reasons up earlier one being that nano has a name to client. The second being that they don't carry a large float like each PQ does so moves get exaggerated. As far as the management and the promotion I don't know too much about what nano has done but HPQ has been very active and evidently not seeing the same results as nano. I believe it's imperative that Bernard start removing the shroud of secrecy on who some of these clients are going to be and until that happens I think we are range bound. People need to see more and the stock price will reflect That information