RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Generation of Hydrogen [
HPQ is also working with industry leader Apollon Solar of France to:
- Use their patented process and develop a capability to produce commercially porous silicon (Si) wafers and porous silicon (Si) powders.
• The collaboration will allow HPQ to become the lowest cost producer of porous silicon wafers for all-solid -state batteries and porous silicon powders for Li-ion batteries.
• Develop the hydrogen generation potential of Silicon nanopowders for use with the Gennao™ system.
• Commercialize, exclusively in Canada, and non-exclusive in the U.S.A., the Gennao™ H2 system and the chemical powders required for the hydrolysis production of Hydrogen ("H2").
quote=dougkimbrough]Apoolon has a patent on making cheap porous silicon. HPQ is getting to use that patent because we are making the cheapest nano silicon which will then be the porous nano silicon. You guys know this.
developbc wrote: BlueMetal75 wrote: DoubleDoubleUp wrote: Then this will be 100 times benefit than the EV sector to HPQ.
TrueCanuck1 wrote: "I believe the greatest significance of this work is the demonstration that silicon can react with water rapidly enough to be of practical use for on-demand hydrogen generation," coauthor Mark Swihart, Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering at the University of Buffalo, told Phys.org. "
Nano-Silicon generated hydrogen 150 times faster than 100-nm silicon and 1,000 times faster than bulk silicon.
But Appollon isn't as interested in the regular old nanosilicon powders like we're making for batteries. For the H2 generation, they want POROUS nanosilicon powders.
Can we make that with the NSiR? Is it more involved and expensive? And what's the difference between the two anyway?
Stay tuned
AIMING TO SEND POROUS SILICON NANOPOWDER SAMPLES TO END USERS BY DECEMBER 2020 Mindful of HPQ’s competitive advantage, the ability of PUREVAP™ QRR to produce 2N to 4N Silicon (Si) at the lowest cost in the industry, HPQ and Apollon are busy manufacturing samples of porous Si nanopowders of different sizes (2 nm to 1 µm) with porous structure sizes of either Microporous (<5nm), Mesoporous (5nm – 50nm) and Macroporous (>50nm).
The aim being to send samples, to end-users’ specifications, by December 2020.
[/quote]