RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Patents have value @iscfa, Do you know what canopy is claiming GW pharma is infringing on? Are you certain it's the simply Co2 extraction or specific steps along the way?
You stated "GW Pharma was aware of this patent for many years. They would not willing infringe this patent if they thought it was valid."
With that logic the same could be said from a previous poster. "Canopy would not waste their time and money if it was so obvious (in your opinion) that it is going to fail."
Canppy has lawyers who are going off information they have and are confident it's worth presuing. As they know GW will fight it. If nothing worth fighting for they wouldn't waste their time. Many employees leave disgruntled with information of ongoings of facility. (GW pharma)
We are unsure of the information they have, and the specifics to which they're fighting for on their patent.
if you are privy to the above information then please share. Otherwise speaking in absolutes are simply false claims.