VentriPoint Diagnostics Ltd V.VPT

RE:RE:RE:GrahamB

[GrahamB]

Yajne wrote: Get used to saying 'Ouch' you little bashing clown! If you have been around for any length of time you know full and well the struggle that VPT has been through on a shoe-string budget. Yet GA refuses to yield despite the stong headwinds. He has a product that can save significant $$ and improve lives and that's what drives him...as well as getting this over the finish line when he can finally sell VPT and retire.

As for you, there are so many soft-bashing negative things in your post, I hope you just FO for a long time...unless of course you're lying and do have shorting interests, in which case you will continue to post negative sh*te in aim of your goal.

I've not been happy holding this bag for a few years as VPT went through adversay events and were re-born but I do believe they will succeed in the end, if for no other reason that GA's strong willpower. In the meantime, kindly get lost!

GrahamB wrote:

Yajne wrote: ...you're a RAT and you know it. Need all longs to know the same. Kindly FO, or you will be hounded with lots of detail forever, wherever you choose to post

Ouch.
Interesting, that I have only presented data that are directly coming from the financials of this company, and has resulted in such negative posts from the Longs on this board.
These financials, are being given by the directors of this company.

So your negative feelings, in turn, and logically, are misdirected.

Thanks for the advice, but I am now interested in this company, only with the intention of acquiring shares, if and only if, the story does pan out.
I have zero shares at present, and no intention of acquiring any untilo more data is available.

Otherwise, the company has negative working capital, no significant revenue to pay the current liabilities, and have stated that they are using approximately 80,000 a month.
Based on this, unless they are going to continue to raise debentures, it will either have to be debt or additional equity raises.

I am a long only independent investor, and really, shorting has huge risks even if there will be downward pressure.

To me, positive news could come out, such as  new contracts, meaning that you would miss out on the run, but to anyone shorting, it poses the risk that just would not be worth it to me, especially since this technology has been around for years, and there is always the risk of someone else duplicating artificial intelligence, or 3D echo, or any other new technology.
If this really could grow to 100 million, there is plenty of room to run so missing out early is not a concern, but putting capital in with likely dilution, and the risks that the company has stated, it is not worth it.

So again thanks for the advice, but I could not really care if you post negative things about me, as I am just an evidence-based investor that has been successful, thinking for myself, and not believing the story, until I have hard facts.  The harder people push against facts, to me, is a sign in and of itself. My posts are evidence based and stand on thier own.

There isn't any new data-so will return when we have more data. If I miss out-so be it and all the rewards that come to those who risk capital deserve it
 

You are funny in some ways.

It is hard to put together this image of an elderly grandfather, posting such messages, where are you try to skirt the stockhouse rules by repeatedly using profanities, and in reciewing your posts you tend to insult members who have a different point of view.

 

In any event, I will follow along with the stock, and I am very interested to post and hear follow up from anyone who’s interested in talking about this, when there is actual data to review.

 

Paradoxically, your approach of bullying and personal attacks  is stimulating me to hang around-I never liked bullies, and will substitute your approach with principled disagreement and evidence.