Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

NeutriSci International Inc V.NU.H

Alternate Symbol(s):  NRXCF

NeutriSci International Inc. (NeutriSci) is a Canada-based company, which specializes in the production, and formulation of nutraceutical products within the business-to-business (B2B) industry. The Company is focused on the market development for its nutraceutical products. Its products utilize patented form of Pterostilbene called pTeroPure. pTeroPure Pterostilbene is a form of all-trans Pterostilbene that is found naturally in blueberries and is manufactured for NeutriSci by ChromaDex Corp. (ChromaDex) in the United States. NeutriSci’s neuenergy product is an energy tab designed to deliver enhanced focus and mental clarity with no sugar, no calories and no crash that is associated with energy products. It has developed proprietary IP and technology (NeutriSci IP) that creates an efficient method of bilingual absorption of nutraceuticals into the bloodstream. NeutriSci’s IP can be applied to many different categories in the beverage, food, and nutraceutical space.


TSXV:NU.H - Post by User

Comment by VeritasVernon Dec 30, 2020 1:14am
97 Views
Post# 32195186

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I'm pretty sure that

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:I'm pretty sure that
Edcando wrote:


To everyone else my apologies. We are all human and we all have our own faults. Mine is falling for the fight baiting traps that others lay for me. It's something I struggle with because I'm sick of the ignorant society we have become. I at least admit this fault and try to better by simply putting these bozos on ignore once I finally figure out I've been baited. I have no problem with postive /negative sentiments or even civil adult like disagreements. What I have no tolerance for is abject stupidity and ignorance. While I tell others to do better I will endeavour to do the same. Regardless ones position here GLTUA on all our investment decisions and strategies 

Now for Vern

Lol not only is he never right but he can't even come up with his own insults (it's what I said to bipolar ginger this am). As bad as sid is , you're worse because of your immature attempts to bait me,by quoting someone I put on ignore long ago  your  thinking his weak insult is funny, and your complete lack of understanding of market terms leading to your confusion this morning (no . Potential market cap never on its own means "market cap after next news" lol)

Also your second to last post shows you to be the pumping promoter you accuse others of being simply because you're trying to promote the stock using only drivel. There's not one solitary Veritas Bone in your spineless body. It's obvious this can go nowhere with someone so dumb so I'll simply put you in the same sinking boat as sid. 


 


 

Sorry Eddy but you have worked yourself into a froth and as usual confused the funk out of all of us. What was the point you are trying to make? 

Seriously folks, I think he has me on ignore which is a bit of a partial relief. This guy clearly has some serious issues, attackes everyone, apoligies and then goes on the attack again. He sends an unsolisited post inviting all to provide their views on his delusional quantification and when Ginger has some legitimate comments he unravels and then when I question a rise from a $17 million cap to $1 billion and instead suggest $100 million he loses his shilt. Im not a doctor but there is some real deep-rooted cognitive concerns here. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>