RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:5 year viewI like the potential risk/reward ratio, it is extremely asymmetrical where you risk losing a lot to gain 100x. I already know that it is extremely risky creating a new market (there is demand at a certain price for graphene). The difference between EV and graphene is the fact that this is not dependent on customers changing habits, incentives, tax breaks etc etc, it is targeted at companies looking to both save and make money by providing a superior product with a new or replaced additive... Much easier imo. You are very skeptical that NanoXplore can deliver 4000tpa, but are you equally skeptical of graphene as an additive? The whole selling point is that NanoXplore can deliver graphene at commercially competitive prices in industrial quantities and if they can do that, the market will explode. I don't care much for emotions when it comes to investing or talking on forums, but i think you are overlooking how asymmetrical the potential return is here and i am not sure if any other graphene company comes close since they are unable to produce industrial quantities (>1000tpa)