RE:Shareholders cry for a communication approach The IR strategy is exactly what you stated. It is ineffective.
The thought was that an "event" when announced would be recognized by investors and the buying would propel the share price and enhance shareholder value. It has yet to happen but it is also the wrong approach.
One should build a shareholder base of supporters, where investors understand what the company does and means to them. You will have a strong shareholder base. Building such a base requires at a minimum ongoing shareholder communication and reaching out to new investors.
Attracting investors based on an "event" will bring unwanted volatility and MOMO traders, not your ideal investor base. Those who have been here for years represent a good solid investor base, we hold as per Oats calculations a good solid 30% of shares o/s.
Hoping that 2021 brings more answers than questions while we wait for a NCC / PGX deal.
Minty_33 wrote: Or strategy because there is none. Nobody marketing the company except for Gilles participating at the odd conference and appearing at [paid promotional message] which has clearly done close to nothing for the company in terms of attracting new investors and creating volume/ liquidity. I didn't see anything relating to marketing on Giles's resume and he's not the best speaker / spokesman (no insult intended) Perhaps the company should focus not a little, but a lot in this important area. N'est pas?