RE:New!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So how does everyone perceive this article ?
I personally see it as someone trying to take a negative swing at taat.
But let's read between the lines. The peope taking negatively are and " anti smoking group", obviously there view will be bias towards taat as a new combustible option.
the doctor in the atrticle is part of tobacco 21 ( another anti smoking group) and is clearly out of his mind when he asks why would you smoke a mysterious substance. What are you smoking in a tobacco cigarette? Oh ya thousands of chemicals and unknown garbage.
So obviously this is a completly one sided view and Doesn't concern me.
then you have a paragraph about Philip Morris and there e-cig. Now that to me looks like some advertising. Who do you think would do that ? Maybe a tobacco company, illl let you guess which one.
really the only thing that has me wondering is the part about the fda. I really don't no if taat has to be regulated as a drug if the make a claim that there product helps quite nicotine. I now if they say that the cbd will help them it's an issue but there claiming it's the action not the ingredients. So I'm on the fence about that.
if someone is paying for this then taat is a threat to them. Which is good.