RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Impressive presentationThe stock will not move on a higher EPS because of a f@#$ing investment.
It will move only on PYR's profits.
LOOK at the stock price with an EPS of .10 last Q.
It has gone from $4 to $3.75.
Market doesn't care for HPQ investment.
The proof is there.
What else is there to prove to you.
An EPS of .10 should have broght the stock up to $5 or $6.
Am I not right about this?
YES I AM
Qtrlbder wrote: Wtf fdfd12, is a f@#$ing investment. Its not help from HPQ.
fdfd12 wrote: Playing with words.
Let's put it properly.
EPS with HPQ was .10
EPS only PYR was .02-.03.
Let's leave it at that
This shows me what PYR does without the help of HPQ.
What happens if HPQ goes from $1.00 to .80.
Then PYR will show an EPS of -.10 because of HPQ.
Then what will you guys say?
PteRoy wrote: Thats not what you asked him. You asked him if taking out their HPQ investment, would their EPS for last Q be around .02 or .03. He answered yes to that question. You did not ask why did you report an EPS of .10 when you're EPS should only be .2. In that question, you would have received a very different answer.
fdfd12 wrote: Very impressive.
I asked him the first question.
I asked him about the EPS for last Q.
I asked him "was it .10 like this board is claiming or was it closer to .02 to .03".
He answered it YES it is closer to .02 and .03 and NOT .10 like this board is claiming.
I guess this board is now going to call PETER a soft basher too.
Peter CEO is a soft basher according to this board.
Peter is a realist like me.
Guys wake up and smell the coffee.