RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Impressive presentationPteRoy
I do not have a problem with the way it is recognized.
I also see that the stock price is not rising with the HPQ gain.
The stock price will rise when the EPS of PYR alone is .10.
As I have said before, look at the price NOW.
Look at it please.
It is not rising with an EPS of .10.
I rest my case
PteRoy wrote: If you have a problem with the way EPS is allowed to be recognized, then you go a head and call the regulators and let them know. Pyrogenesis followed the law when they reported their EPS last Q of .10.
fdfd12 wrote: Playing with words.
Let's put it properly.
EPS with HPQ was .10
EPS only PYR was .02-.03.
Let's leave it at that
This shows me what PYR does without the help of HPQ.
What happens if HPQ goes from $1.00 to .80.
Then PYR will show an EPS of -.10 because of HPQ.
Then what will you guys say?
PteRoy wrote: Thats not what you asked him. You asked him if taking out their HPQ investment, would their EPS for last Q be around .02 or .03. He answered yes to that question. You did not ask why did you report an EPS of .10 when you're EPS should only be .2. In that question, you would have received a very different answer.
fdfd12 wrote: Very impressive.
I asked him the first question.
I asked him about the EPS for last Q.
I asked him "was it .10 like this board is claiming or was it closer to .02 to .03".
He answered it YES it is closer to .02 and .03 and NOT .10 like this board is claiming.
I guess this board is now going to call PETER a soft basher too.
Peter CEO is a soft basher according to this board.
Peter is a realist like me.
Guys wake up and smell the coffee.