RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:fdfd12Because they are weak and need excuses to justify the share price which they thought would be much higher. Real analysts and institutions dissect the financial information. It is easy for them to interpret financial statements. They know how to dissect earnings. I bet you many of them who are slamming you have not even opened the financial statements or the MD and A and have just read the newsrelease, and even there could not figure it out. From my perspective I was late to the party and invested for the first set of torch deals.PYR missed the mark and was not able to read the clients correctly. But now they know that they thought clients would not move that fast. They did not believe McW and lectured him because he was not pruvy to insider information. Well, PYR was obviously not privy to client's boardroom discussions. It will be successful but it will take time. There are too many unknowns for real analysts to put big numbers on anything AT THIS STAGE. That is the inconvenient truth. I believe your $20 to $30 SP target for this year is aggressive. I would be more than happy with a triple from here.
fdfd12 wrote:
Why are you guys mad at me?
All I am saying with my tiny brain is that
If HPQ helps PYR's earnings, the market will not
recognize that and PYR's stock price will NOT rise.
PYR will only rise by helping itself with orders.
It is obvious. We can see that last Q, with an EPS of
.10, the stock price didn't go up.
I still think PYR will deliver and the stock price will be
between $20-$30 by year end.
I think it will do about .20 each Q on its own without the help of HPQ.
Where is the bashing of this tiny brain?
Guys, I have been RIGHT ALL ALONG.