Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

HPQ Silicon Inc V.HPQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  HPQFF

HPQ Silicon Inc. (HPQ) is a Canada-based technology company specializing in green engineering of silica and silicon-based materials. The Company is engaged in developing, with the support of technology partners PyroGenesis Canada Inc. (PyroGenesis) and Novacium SAS, new green processes to make the critical materials needed to reach net zero emissions. Its activities are centered around the three pillars: becoming a green low-cost (Capex and Opex) manufacturer of Fumed Silica using the Fumed Silica Reactor, a proprietary technology owned by HPQ being developed for HPQ by PyroGenesis; becoming a producer of silicon-based anode materials for battery applications with the assistance of Novacium SAS, and Novacium SAS is engaged in developing a low carbon, chemical base on demand and high-pressure autonomous hydrogen production system. The Company operates in a single operating segment, segment, being the sector of the transformation of quartz into silicon materials and derivative products.


TSXV:HPQ - Post by User

Comment by patience123on Jan 10, 2021 10:22am
372 Views
Post# 32263006

RE:RE:RE:RE:I dont see any reason why silicon

RE:RE:RE:RE:I dont see any reason why silicon
Pitpitcolisse wrote: So the fact he doesn't have all those answers makes you think your speculations are good?  

Yes some are working on 100% silicon anode (Sila, Amprius) but even with carbon coating and nano size there are many challenges and resolving those challenges is costly and probably that those would not be economical for mass production, and especially a challenge to include in cylindrical batteries like Tesla uses. It's easier to manage the swelling in a pouch cell instead and that is what Sila and Amprius are making with 100% Si anodes.

Yes, even the new byproduct has a better performance than graphite in a lab setting but that's not to say that the challenges from Silicon's swelling (cracking of the particle, cracking of the SEI layer, etc) don't appear when going to higher content.

So my take is that, while yes Tesla could be interested in our product, they wouldn't go to 100% Si anodes, but also that Sila and Amprius could easily be the battery manufacturers requesting our product samples for their 100% Si anodes. There could also be Talga and Novonix who are both working on a composite NanoSi-Graphite particle as potential clients.

The important thing remember is we'll create the cheapest 2N-4N mettalurgical grade Si, and the cheapest NanoSi with an optional carbon coating, so any Si anodes would be cheaper with HPQ Silicon. 



patience123 wrote:
TITANIUMJOE wrote: If you watch all of the recent YouTube videos on the limiting factor channel they explain that the benefits start to decline once you go higher than 30% silicon. Of course this may be solved by using a different electrolyte or with further advancements but so far a 30% silicon anode looks to be the most promising. 
hmmm yes....the limiting factor...and exactly what size of silicon was he referrring to? Was it nano silicon? How about carbon coated nano silicon? Did he have all the data on that to determine 30% was the the maximum and most efficient? Oh what about a biproduct of silicon that hpq thought was important enough to put a patent on? Does he have the electical characteristics of that by any chance?  One thing i have always lived by is that as much as one person is an expert in there is always someone somewhere that knows more..
 


im not speculating at all...All im saying is " we dont know what we dont know" so to put a maximum of 30% silicon and nail a hard number on it at this point in time is a bit premature.  But...if i were to speculate i would say that in the future a 90-100 percent silicon anode will be commin place.  Four years ago i made a post on this board  speculating that PYR could easily make nano silicon for the next jump in battery technology considering they already done that with titanium it wasnt to far of a stretch.  This was at a time when we were reading about how scientists had made a breakthrough and had found that nano silicon particles had great potential for becomming the new standard in future battery technology...four years later.....its now a reality.   And no i dont have a crystal ball...but i can read writing on a wall.

cheers!

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>