RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:not impressed with the presentationOK, so the economics are not there for much, much wider application. That is good to know. Scratch that one from ridiculous annual revenue projections. Now we are peeling the onion.
bcsc wrote: Not every city/company has an ajacent nuclear reactor to provide cheap electricity.
canyousayiii wrote: Every city, lots of companies. So, why not is the big question. Is it limited sales resources to peddle this product?
Stubbyinsider wrote: You would think every city should have MANY of these waste disposal systems!
canyousayiii wrote: I think this alignment is relating to the beginning of torch sales. Signs of adoption by the three clients is everything. I have to admit though that given the waste disposal long history and credibility, I dont understand why the uptake is so slow, or non existent outside US military so far. A lot more places generating waste than pelletizing iron ore and a few systems have been operating for several years.
Stubbyinsider wrote: I agree, I liked the education side of it. I see no issue with PYR being north of $30 this year if everything aligns as it should. I believe we see that upward trend begin tomorrow.
canyousayiii wrote: I found it appropriately balanced towards informational rather than promotional. Very different that way from some previous NRs or Agoracom discussions. No need to speculate whether my impression is correct even though I indicated my thought before the uplisting that the style would likely have to change. While I love guarantees and very specific targets, I prefer them not being made when they cant be. And that's why I liked this presentation even though it doesnt make me look for more money to invest and adds to the disappointment of not hitting that $100 anytime soon. Sorry Uncle. ;-)