RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PEA vs. NI 43-101Pin this to top of bullboard noticed big shot Lanny had no response.
I hope this guy was a seller and got out. So many great points .....this team straight up doo doo
greasy
big shot Lanny talking about all his big time investments and huge wins but spends all day posting responses here and no where else. Big shot Lanny why waste so much time here? Why not post over at Temas the virtues of that latest investment? Lots of bashing over there? Why aren’t you telling them not to knock your investment ?
LOL cause your full of sh*t
have a great weekend all ! Blueborrow probably having a real hard time sleeping. Gords dreaming of his $$$$$ that could’ve been. A lot of people getting pumped hard.
Greasy
GG
kees333 wrote: Better management remains to be seen. although after a multi year near standstill, everything could be supposed to be an improvement.
The connections you speak of, by the way:j
- a ceo (I think it was the ceo, whose bio is 6/7 filled with text pertaining to him doing something a Red Lake / Campbell (what was it...?), looong time ago. After that the bio ends in uncomprehensive humbug.
The connection that's supposed to exist is with Cronin group?? Which is owned by this fellow Temas board member Kyler Hardy, who seems to have nothing to show for but board membership of an endless row of irrelevant juniors.
Mr. Hardy is currently the CEO of Cronin Group, director and CEO of Imperial X Plc and director of Hexa Resources, among other private and public companies.
And that list of companies is actually larger, and there's a lot of back and fort selling of interests in properties and 'loans to the company' going on.
What this partership actually states is an informal acknoledgement by TD and BF that they don't have the energy, power or brains to complete the exploration cycle.
Well better get the h#ll out then.
And what is this switch from 'multi billion dollar companies with extensive bla bla bla in boron' e5 cetera to a bunch of nobodies in the boron world, with nothing but debt on their balance sheet to show for?
One could go on...
MY MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION IS, HOWEVER:
What article in which law exactly states that a company (investco...) in the process of judicial restructuring can't close a deal with a company. (as was given by EV as reason for the failing of the deal with investco).
What exactly was the judicial reason?
And could we as shareholders see that communication?
And can we hear the name of the company now?
And why exactly did the deal with investco 2 not go through?
If investco was so interested in EV up to the publishing of the press release, etc etc, then why was a judicial hickup / delay enough to stop the deal?
Instead of speculating about Piskanja revenue, as so many times before, let's dig into the past a little bit.