RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New investors from the dealMy point is they need to bring in midium to long term investors on board who are convinced to stay put which CYDY has managed but not our company due to marketing issue , apart from last few days the daily volume is nothing compared to CYDY so yes the damping effect of millions of warrants hanging about on a illiquid equity with a company who can't market will be much more than CYDY.
In a sense what you suggested convert the investors to traders which is the opposite scenario the company should aim for.
SPCEO1 wrote: You may have noticed the presence of warrants, literally hundred of millions of warrants, has not hindered CYDY from seeing its s tock advance ina stratospheric way.
More seriously, I am not sure that your concern, if I understand it correctly, is legitimate. The warrants are not goingt o control the share price. What is the difference if the company raises money via warrants converting or any other form of financing? We know this funding is only going to cover two years of trial expenses so we know they are going to be raising more money no matter what. So, I am not sure what your point is.
scarlet1967 wrote: The company is supposed to support the valuation as the SP is well undervalued, how would they be able to attract new institutional and retail investors when they are millions of warrant issued, who would even consider investing in the company when they know the SP will be controlled by warrant holders in the next few years?