RE:Should have commented on growth Absolutely. This is a fluff announcement meant to assuage current investors. Suggests growth but also loss from legacy business. Conveniently does not talk about net growth. What does it cost to put out these fluff pieces? WIth the legal costs involved in preparing, signing off and publishing such releases, who really benefits from such a release?
Oh I see. Its the lawyers who more have more hours to invoice for this cr**p announcement!
And again we do not see Proctor and his fellow non-shareholder board members buying at least one share each. That, more than anything else, is the elephant in the room, not these fluff pieces.