RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VolumeLoL! Yup, coincidental timing, as I was just thinking about it. Yes, I am aware and no issue there. It is a mix of lower and higher OS counts on the Venture as well as the success which is not related to the counts. It doesnt matter how many shares a good performing company has and folk seem to have opinions what would help. Reverse is a kiss of death in general. Some that want a piece cheaper would like a reverse. And you know what happens when there are less than 50 million shares....folk start saying it is illiquid. XBC and PYR have no issues with similar floats. EGT even higher and making some moves lately like SHRC.
Scanner454 wrote: the reference of 160 million shares is not to sharc but tmg.....you knew that right?