Mission Ready Solutions Inc V.MRS.H

Stability and Sustaining Growth!

[ScarletSpider]

what I am ultimately after is not just big contracts for product that is a key piece but one in which contracts apparently can get killed without any consenquences to those who breach them which leaves the company in a bad way is those who will be additive value and held accountable due to being a partner with a vested interest of making money. What I am the most after in seeing from this company are either wholly owned subsidiaries that will work on the scales of economies in foreign countries of production and distribtuions wihin those countries and possibly those nearby or a jv partner where there is a licensing royalty of 20% on a non exclusive basis limited to various jurisdictions so if the wholly owned subsidiaries do open they are not competing with those who are partners that are generating monies on a royalties basis. So what you will have is a more complex business structure vs just the company providing to the clients who can potentially welch with little to no consequences, to people who are being held accountable because of sharing in a stake to making monies either wholly owned or strategic parnterships.

This is a key component to any company let alone this one. Where it is cost affective in terms of manufacturing, storing, and distribution these are the things that kill any company unless they have so much offsetting revenue that they can look after all of it and even so any bump along the road can bring a lot of hardship. I would be looking more the licensing royalty route despite giving up the lionshare of the profit but you also give up the lionshare of the expenses as well.

In Canada there is a 30% foreign business alotment as to my understanding that as long as it remains no more than this businesses are taxed at the same corporate rates as all others but if it exceeds it the rate goes up. While I am a strong proponent to keeping jobs domestic I also understand that it is not realistic to do so for companies to thrive and maximize profits so I fully agree with this composition where 30% business can go overseas to set up production plants or 30% foreign workers can be hired. 

Countries like for their people to be working as it would be less headache to them and I strongly believe this is the way going about things in an ever shrinking and highly I don't like to say competitive world--

Sure while people will sneer that there are loss of jobs and corporations are greedy making hand over fist one should also look at the flip side, that a lot of what we are able to consume is quite a bit cheaper. Nevertheless, I know we can get into a circular argument here that if the jobs stayed here we would have more monies to spend so the costs being a bit higher wouldn't matter so it is a debate that people can really go at until the cows come home. The reality is what it is--companies want to maximize profits, shareholders want to make tons of monies etc.

The bottom line is that follow the money and make it because the reality is that through globalization no matter how much even governments want buy local keep jobs domestic they can only do so to a certain extent goes back to what I said about Joe Biden and what he will be able to do and not--when you have people like Apple starting to become not happy and lobby you well I think you will have to rethink things because it also means providing cheaper products to the people in which if the costs goes up the people will not be happy--so no matter what every politicians hands are tied on this matter. One will have to see what is making the best monetary sense and dynamics for the country as there are benefits to have buying outside one's boarders.

In any case, I will be looking to see partners not just customers factor in so far the company doesn't have that it is a very integral piece to all this as well.