RE:RE:RE:RE:Interesting study and reality checkPatty, Jose and Shapiro were involved in many trials at the UofA. All of which failed to produce the results Phil and Pitor were able to accomplish. They are just ticked off because they aren't involved with SVA anymore and they aren't as talented as Pitor. Whether or not this works in the long-term is important to people who suffer from diabetes. For that reason I hope it does work but even if it doesn't, money is to be made. That is why most of the people are here. You fellas need to get better at trolling btw, you kind of suck at it lol. I am long and I could come up with a lot more negatives than you have presented. If there were no downside risks this would be several dollars by now. I've seen your posts on your other stocks, lol. Don't quit your day job because you sure don't know how to pick winners so kinda glad you are negative on this play. It means we actually have a chance :-)
cowjazz wrote: Okay NT. You've name-dropped Paty. In the recent Globe article he's quoted:
“They’re showing in principle the pouch works, the cell survives and that they produce insulin. That’s promising and positive, but I don’t see it as earth-shattering.”
Now what does that sound like to you? To me it sounds like sour grapes. You think jealousy, spitefulness, and backbiting doesn't exist in the world of science? Paty sounds like he knows the ship has sailed and he's stuck back on shore.