RE:RE:This is how existing shareholders should be treatedWhy screw over your long term investors if they are not actually getting anything from the new investors? They can't even get an accurate report done up from any of the companies who did the new financing. And it appears a good number of them were happy to unload the shares and just keep the warrants.
scarlet1967 wrote: They apparently wanted new shareholders as "too many of big shareholders are posters on this board".
So this was a lazy way to raise funds and get new investors.
I try move on from the deal but since people bringing it up how is that current royal long term investors are all of sudden a threat to the company?
They could find those investors by actively marketing the company!
May I ask why all the resentment against some knowledgeable posters which have been trying to help the company by coming up with great suggestions?
Didn't they think the new investors will eventually follow this board as this is the best place to get some insights about the company?