Rapid testing vs Biocloud?!Now they are talking about rapid testing all visitors and staff at LTC homes from now on in Ontario.
Imagine the costs involved for that, over having a biocloud installed or two. Up front its biocloud, over time it is the tests that will be way more $$$.
Way more tests than need to be done. Just random and willy nilly instead of only when necessary and Biocloud also tells you the space is safe or not regardless, for further peace of mind.
I mean, are you kidding me? Its no choice. Both intelligence wise and money wise, Biocloud is the better option.
I mentioned this to a medical friend and we talked about Biocloud and I said it was crazy it wasnt getting recognition on the news. His answer was stark. "If you think they (the news) are going to go out of their way to talk about something that would take away from pharma profits, you are crazy. Who do you think benefits from rapid testing? The pharma companies. And the big pharma control everything, including yes, what they want to have said on the news re covid. Biocloud is a threat to them. Until Biocloud starts getting used places -- and are seen working and do what they do -- they wont likely get noticed by news. Not at least until they have to."
Makes you think doesnt it? I never thought of that.
This shows the kind of things a great idea can be up against that you arent even aware of.
(And btw he thought Biocloud was a great invention and needs to get used.)