RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dumping 20M shares and keeping 10M warrants @$3.18I think your responses are perfectly aimed at the facts and totally supported by their data and the factual developments. I had done something similar a while back and was just too tired to keep doing it over and over, but I also don't get why they don't put together a factual argument that acknowledges the past developments and puts ALL the pieces together to form a really convincing case as to why they have every bit as good a chance as anyone else to add this indication to their existing drug. In fact, as you've done, you can actually make an even better case than some of the others out there given the history and the HIV trial being harder. I mean the numbers are all there. I just don't get why they haven't been able to put it all together like that in a convincing way. If all of us here can do it, there is absolutely no reason they can't be doing this.