Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Comment by Uraniuman308on Feb 02, 2021 5:25pm
79 Views
Post# 32453033

RE:RE:Hey Gov

RE:RE:Hey Gov

your comment about the drill program is bang on.  Based on past expectations with management a delayed start and/or failure to complete (for what ever reason) would not be surprising.  JMO


GovernanceQP wrote: The only reason I have had different names is because I have been kicked off a few times.

Suspending an account is a pointless exercise anyways as in it only takes 2 mins to reconfig an IP address then your back in with a new email account if that is what it takes.

With regard to Twitter I come and go from that because it's a bit boring and the Twitter platform has its limitations - if you're interested you can checkout my latest account on Twitter

https://twitter.com/nukeinvestor

Basically I use Twitter to poke fun at people just for the heck of it for the most part.

It's a shame the FCU sharholders here are not up to discussing FCU matters in a slightly more sophisticated way because everyone could learn from comng here. And no matter who you are everyone can learn because there are many very unique experiences that occur in this exploration mine developement thing.

With regard to the latest FCU drill program (assuming it does eventuate) it's a very interesting approach because there is an argument that FCU should 100% focus on drilling the main zone because this is the main game. FCU seem to have decided that spending money on drilling a zone which is not as important is a priority of sorts but my first reaction is that this is not the best approach based on the state of the FCU balance sheet.

In general I think one of the big mistakes that someone like an FCU makes is that they too often make bets that seem to go each way and it results outcomes which are less than optimal. 

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>