RE:RE:RE:RE:Is 1933 a scam??DashForCash wrote: TommeeB - not interested in a negative war of words and in my opinion you are definitely entitled to your opinion...but you have been here for so long already and positive with your comments many many times - to see you kick in with the scam and pocket lining words just causes a person to be disapointed that you would go there - those are unfounded low blows - and that is my opinion that I am entitled to as well...wishing you the best - seriously.
Let me start by saying that no one wants this stock to succeed more than I do. You're right, I've been here for a long time and was an early supporter of the company based on the research I did at the time. It looked promising. There is no disputing that it looks significantly less promising today. It's a penny stock and we all know what can happen in these quarters. I don't think that endless cheerleading is required because someone holds the stock. A company is accountable to its shareholders and when that company performs poorly, as is the case here, someones needs to be held accountable. Shareholders have a right to be outraged by this dismal performance, I am. If 1933 somehow pulls this off and turns things around, I'll be the first to applaud. I just don't see that happening anymore and am pretty much at the point of accepting the loss. I'm holding my shares and continue to maintain interest in the company but I see it now as more of a "hail mary" pass if it comes through. I hope I'm wrong.