Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs in HIV, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and oncology. Its medicines include Trogarzo and EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection). Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk) injection is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. It blocks viral entry into host cells while preserving normal immunologic function. The Company is also investigating an intramuscular method of administration of Trogarzo. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection) is approved in the United States for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in people with HIV who have lipodystrophy.


TSX:TH - Post by User

Comment by palinc2000on Feb 05, 2021 5:32pm
93 Views
Post# 32488516

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:To better understand the complexity of ADCs

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:To better understand the complexity of ADCsI get everything you say in paragraph 3 ..We have known that for quite a while ,,,We are all hoping it works on human given that the dose can be multiplkied by x factor with low toxivcity ,,,,But what is the purpose of talking about the molecuklar structure or whatever,,,,Thus is not a scientific forum where PHD s argue and argue over such things
This is how I feel and am guessing the silent majority feels the same,
I love Scarlett business approach with a mixture of researvch that even I can understand

Wino115 wrote: You can skip them. It all came about from the Barclays Capital model on Trodelvy. Since it's selling into a similar market as TH1902 would if successful in trials, we can think of that as an attainable revenue stream for THTX. Knowing what they got in their Phase 2 and 3 trial, we can understand what would be needed for Accelerated Approval. 

Given there the drug was effective, but still have modest adverse events, it stands to reason if you can have those same results but none of the adverse events (which is what SORT1+ pitches), you'd have a pretty competitive product out there. So as few guys started comparing the ADC models to the PDCs to see where the advantages and disadvantages lie.  I think we understand them more.

From this discussion it seems to me that if TH1902 works, you should see much less side effects, a higher dosage getting in to the actual tumor and a much longer treatment window.  If that's the case, you may not see higher response rates, but you should see better SAE numbers and if you correlate more toxin for longer = more tumor killing capacity, much more shrinkage of mass and hopefully longer survival.  Just some handicapping going on with the info. 



palinc2000 wrote: Excuse my ignorance but it seems to me that since TH has already committed to and received a may proceed letter from Fda that the rehashing of ADC vs PDC and most of the other scientific stuff adds nothing to the investment thesis ,Unfortunately or fortunately the decision to go ahead with the peptide has been vetted by the scientific team ,consuktants and the CMO at TH.I dont see how all this research and eloquent scientific terms proves anything other than some here have a scientific background
Let Phase 1 run its course and then discuss the results but the rest is hogwash imo




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse