RE:RE:RE:RE:Warrants Leverage Extreme Example$2,125,189 divided by $1,134,500 = ~1.87 Times I think this is the Leverage. I'm not sure what you would call the 11,464 Times I calculated would be called. I got my mind into a pretzel. LOL
Anways, forget everything after the First Post. Husky4000 said my math was correct on my first post.
All just my opinion/view/thinking.
RagingBull3 wrote: 11,464x($100-$13.58)= $990,718.88
$990,718.88 + $1,134,500 (common profits) = $2,215,218 (close to warrent profits)
So is it 11,464 TIMES leverage???? over the Commons??? After $13.58????
RagingBull3 wrote: Brain Fart..... no way it can be 11,464 times...... My Tin Foil Hat must be bent out of shape, and my thinking went down the wrong path...
$2,125,189 is not 11,464 times $1,134,500............LOL Yet, below still makes sense to me some how?
RagingBull3 wrote: I think In this example, the Leverage = 23809-12345=
11,464 TIMES ! So I think every penny over $13.58, warrents earn ~11,464 times over the common shares I think!!!
NOW that's Leverage!
Am I correct on this????
Again, all just my thinking/view/opinion/calculating...... Could be wrong, or way out on my thinking.
RagingBull3 wrote: You have $100,000 to spend. You can buy Warrents at $4.20 or Commons at $8.10.
$100,000/4.20= 23809 shares
$100,000/8.10= 12345 shares
1 year later common share price rockets up to $100
Profit on Commons = 12345x100 - $100,000 = $1,134,500
Profit on Warrents if you excerise them = 23809x100 -$100,000 -23809x6.54 = $2,125,189
When you buy the Warrants, you are paying for this leverage/Time Value.
I think in this situation the price of ~$13.58 would result where the outcome is the same (profits would be the same)
So, if in 5 years you think commons will go higher than $13.58, owning the warrents a better deal.
Ok, someone PLEASE check my math. Is my math and thinking correct, or am I way out to lunch???
All just my opinion/view/think/calculating