CivilityWow! Nice quality from everyone on the most recent posts. Differing views were expressed and all of them were devoted to the prospects of OGC, not the person sending the message.
And, now an apology from Esther1 for not keeping posts “focused completely on the subject matter and not the poster.” Nice acknowledgement! More important, however are the following words: “We are all trying to contribute in our own ways, and as long as the criticism is based on the subject matter and not the messenger, it is valid, in my opinion.” I endorse that.
Let us all attempt to focus on the subject matter (OGC) and not on extraneous things like the number of shares we own, when we buy or sell, or how much we have made or lost. I am interested in reading facts about the company or thoughtful opinions about the company’s performance and prospects.
Regarding the company’s prospects at Didipio, I would like to add a fifth question to Esther1’s concerns.
5) If the FTAA is renewed, presumably it will be for another 25 years. During that time the ore at Didipio will be depleted. Didipio reserves at the end of 2019 were 1.26 million ounces of gold which means about 9 more years at 140,000 ounces per year. I know there are other very good sites near Didipio. Will OGC be able to explore, develop and replace their reserves?
As well as questions of profit sharing and ability to operate unhindered by local government, I will be looking for answers about the longevity of Didipio.