RE:RE:RE:Our first hit piece... we made it!Indeed Mr. canyousayiii, we are back to back on this. Healthy skepticism is all well and good. But he made a case, as it were. He suggested that facts not enetered into evidence should lead to an adverse conclusion. Well, tmaybe if we were talking about the actions of a deranged despot but information being withheld is the nature of proprietary information and the reason patent protections exist so that is a somewhat reckless implication on his part. So, based on his piece one could think this could all be a big scam but as you already rightly noted we are well beyond the point where those with access would have found that out. Either that or heads are on the block so to speak. I see ihis piece as nothing more than speculation and doubt much like we have read or seen expressed here from time to time.Just researched from a different angle and perspective. Yet not convincing.
Perhaps he thinks he is helping inform the public to stop us from making a blunder and investing in this technology... because he is not convinced it can work.. Perhaps his editor said "here, write something up on this" and he did his best without bias and it is just too hard for him to accept CEM brokethrough. And maybe he isn't fully apprised of the current situation.
I say that because his piece does not mention the 2 mil investment to pump capacity to 20k.
I was already posting today about how unique and innovative Kontrol's approach to the problem (and the market) is when out of curiosity i came across his piece. He thinks he knows better and you know how I respond to that.
But this is an interesting moment indeed. Hold my hand, canyou sayiii, hold my hand.while we wait for Kontrol to respond to this provocation, eh? :)