RE:RE:I've read more about JarryI don't typically have qualms with your posts and while I agree with your asessment of production and sales you did not adress the concern about skepticism and doubt. It does matter - even if there are sales. The point is that there seems to be legitimate concern among some in the science community (again: legitimate). It should not be ignored or taken as an attack. If the canadian govt is invested in the success of this thing then Canadian science needs to share a concensus view it is the right path forward and works, It can't just be some - and those guys are not fringe. So, how do you rectify that? Sure, the train is running full speed but we don't have all the switchmen following the same lead.
It can be a real problem. You don't want a rollout tainted by doubt and unsanswered concerns. So while they remain we will be held back or we will move forward amidst potential contoversy. Well who cares if it all works right? By the same token, if it all works, these doubters could be satisfied by lining up a demo for them or something along those lines. Maybe not the way they asked but an attempt at a solution should be undertaken. It would only boost success. We don't want to be beta max.
Jarry's opinion resonates with many. Not so easily ignored in my view. I'm not bashing the stock, I'm long. But as real as the obvious efforts by Kontrol are the resistance could be as well if not overcome with more evidence soon. I'll be happy to be wrong about this.