Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Reconnaissance Energy (Africa) Ltd V.RECO

Alternate Symbol(s):  RECAF | V.RECO.WT | RCNWF

Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas company. The Company is engaged in the exploration of the Damara Fold Belt and Kavango Rift Basin in the Kalahari Desert of northeastern Namibia and northwestern Botswana. The Company holds interest in a petroleum exploration license no. 0073 (PEL 73) in northeast Namibia and an interest in petroleum exploration rights in northwest Botswana over the Kavango Sedimentary Basin. The Company's exploration license covers an area of approximately 25,341.33 square kilometers (km2) (6.3 million acres) of oil and/or gas exploration properties comprising Blocks 1719, 1720, 1721, 1819, 1820 and 1821 situated in the Kavango Basin of northeast Namibia (the Namibia Licensed Property) and approximately 7,592 km2 (1.88 million acres) in Botswana (the Botswana Licensed Property). The two licenses together comprise over 32,933 km2 (8 million acres).


TSXV:RECO - Post by User

Comment by Goaweighon Feb 22, 2021 11:12pm
338 Views
Post# 32633956

RE:RE:Botswana Farm Out

RE:RE:Botswana Farm OutI was a bit dubious of this deal at first glance but took another look and now although it's weird I don't see that it's particularly harmful to RECO. Or at least it's not devastatingly so.
Apparently Stienke accumulated/structured the Botswana acreage in his own name. I've seen this done before and it can be very lucrative for the individual staking/aquiring the ground. He then sold/transferred it to RECO but held back 50 % on certain terms that actually requires him to make certain payments to RECO over time, none of which are particularly onerous. He then took that 50 % and sold it to a Co. he was the CEO of for a large position of stock, although given that ROE properties are currently worthless I don't think the deal he did was particularly good. He took 30,000,000 shares increasing his position from 3 % to 11 % ...who cares. 
Now when deals like this are done, pre discovery, all you're doing is trading large amounts of toilet paper for unproven ground but if RECO hit on it's Namibian ground that Botswana ground would be worth a fortune over night. So RECO did a cheap deal to Stienke who in turn did a cheap deal to ROE , I understand the RECO/Stienke deal but I don't understand why he flipped it ROE which is a pig. I would have kept the 50 % of Botswana and taken my chances that Namibia would work out and then flip Botswana for an absolute fortune.
But that's just me I guess. If Namabia and Botswan fails he still owns 30,000,000 ROE toilet paper. Hey, maybe we get another COVID spike and that ROE TP will actually be worth something.



hydrocarbss wrote: The following is a backstory with facts and conjecture.  RNSFF (OTC symbol) led by Stienke went into Mexico in early 2010s.  Mexico, struggling with crude production changed their constitution and allowed for foreign companies to bid on producing oil.  It had been Pemex's playground for over 60 years.  Just as RNSFF was going to hit a large field with modern extraction techniques, Mexico had an election.  AMLO won and foreign oil companies lost.  The govt just stopped the process of progressing on the contracts.  Many people, wealthy people put up money for RNSFF.  It hasn't really paid off for them.  Here we are a few years later, Stienke has landed an entire basin in Africa.  He has folks he might owe a favor, that hold RNSFF shares. Well what if there's a deal where RNSFF can get a substantial cut of the Botswana acreage for peanuts.  Would that satisfy the big investors who still hold RNSFF shares? And there you have it.  

Supposition and reality woven into a realistic narrative.




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>