RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Samplespaul0316 wrote: I get they overachieved. My point is they shouldn't give specific timelines on things they don't control. Nobody knew what specifications would be churned out on first attempts. So why tell everyone end of December-early January? There was a lot of hype about shipment leading into the new year. Anyways like I said I know they always deliver in the end, I've been here long enough to attest to that.
Koooo wrote: Well they overachieved on their first samples. Would you rather them send the wrong ones or get the right ones and do it right the first time. I think it'll be before the week's out but if it's next week that's okay too.
Possibly a lesson learned for both investors & mgmt...Sample delivery projections were based on computer simulation-based predictions, which we now know can be imperfect. There are lots of variables at play for the NSiR (temperature levels, reactants, reactant ratios, human error, etc.) & it's probably best to not put a timeline on new science/technology, especially when you are trying to perfect it. It's fruitless to worry when all of the technical parts & know-how seem to be in place...just needs some fine-tuning & some patience. GLTA.