OTCPK:ICPVF - Post by User
Comment by
Maxmoeon Feb 23, 2021 3:44pm
186 Views
Post# 32639214
RE:RE:IPL asking price-24$
RE:RE:IPL asking price-24$ Hilariously naive of you dotbomb. There is NO way bip would happily let them "shop it around". Let's start with this. Why does the ipl board need bip to "let " them shop it around. They can shop it without their permission. That's absurdly arrogant of Brookfield. Next, Brookfield attached a lot of grievousely one sided conditions to "letting" them shop it. 1] bip would insist on the ipl board issuing a public recommendation in favour of the bid. 2] bip would insist on the coup d'etat ROFR which would make the shopping process pointless and unable to attract a higher bid and 3) they would insist on having full access to "the data room" which would include material non public information. And last 4) bip would reserve the right to pull the offer any time they want. That's the price for a "friendly" deal that would allow the board to shop. If that ain't predatory , than run through a pack of lions butt naked with a broken leg. Good luck to US. GFY to BROOKFIELD.
downwithdotcom1 wrote: as i said earlier - BROOKFIELD isn't the problem here - we (BROOKFIELD) say its worth LOW, you (IPL) say its worth HI . BROOKFIELD says heres are offer plus WE WILL LET YOU SHOP IT AROUND...doesn't scream exactly predatory like - IPL management is duty bound for the interests of the shareholders and not about protecting their own jobs..dwdc
from SCOTIA (which is inline whats already been reported...)
A non-binding proposal for a transaction was first made in November in the $17.00-$17.50 range, with Brookfield open to a mutually acceptable go-shop arrangement. In mid-December Brookfield increased the indicative offer price to $18.25.