RE:3rd company name in a year You guys spend an awful amount of time here on this stock that is SO TERRIBLE! So here is a question for you..........
WHY?
Pachuko wrote: If you look at this company it has had three names and stock symbols in a year, 5 private placements and a 6 to 1 stock split. The president has no history in the battery business and they basically have the marketing rights to some Chinese made products that they have no reported sales numbers on. Their chief engineering consultant is an ex BC Hydro staffer(not insulting BC Hydro just isn't a major expert in the battery field) and there does not seem to be any r&d work going on in Canada (i did not find any evidence of this so if someone has they can post it)
No actual revenue statements to date and a name change 3 times in a year. No R&D department or owned technology (not sales rights to other ownership). This looks to be e a group of or one finance guy looking to pivot for a third time to see if they can find a new strategy to make money. nothing at all solid about this play and the history shows some red flags to be sure. Not saying it cant succeed but there are a number of factors that should concern investors.
Is it possible the name change application is the next news release???