RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SEC filing It's not about using imperative or permissive terminology, it's about bonuses should be based on past performance and results.
It is not an automatic exercise and the board should evaluate it annually.
The whole idea is to encourage people to do a better job and if they get it regardless what the heck is the point of it.
realitycheck4u wrote: Here's why.
“We believe (they were wrong) that being listed on NASDAQ will help (not "for sure", just help) to foster interest (not deliver it for sure, just "forster it") from more potential (not fure sure, just potential) investors and financial analysts, and that it should (not for sure) result in increased liquidity for investors. If you cannot read a statement without also reading what it means, that's a problem my friend.
palinc2000 wrote: Lol!!!
realitycheck4u wrote: You are losing my respect. That's the stupidest comment on this board in a very long time.
palinc2000 wrote: From the August 12 2019 PR re application for Nasdaq Listing......I am not 100% certain but I think part of Dubuc s bonus was based on Listing on the Naz.......IF this is the case then maybe .there should be clawback clauses on bonuses
“We believe that being listed on NASDAQ will help to foster interest from more potential investors and financial analysts, and that it should result in increased liquidity for investors. Theratechnologies will enter NASDAQ with a strong commercial portfolio and a research pipeline that will undoubtedly attract more attention and be better recognized,” said Philippe Dubuc, Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, Theratechnologies Inc