RE:RE:RE:RE:MeetingBullsprig57 wrote: I wonder why they decided on 10-1 reverse split and not 7-1 or similar. Would seem to have plenty of room in case of price retracement to meet NASDQ requirements. Also, one of the the requirements has to do with no. of shares traded daily. The less the price, the more shares for the same money would trade.
As it has been explained by Kha the ratio has not been decided yet. The key is the "up to" words:
"The consolidation of the Company’s Common Shares on the basis of up to one (1) post-consolidation Common Share for every ten (10) pre-consolidation Common Shares (the "Consolidation") was approved ..."