empress9 wrote: Pachuko wrote: empress
i would suggest that going forward respond only to posts that are geared to actual dialogue. the Generac discussion is a good example. Why does anyone need to get defensive about that?
I suggest you leave the three amigos to their own single minded group discussion(if it is even three. could be one with three accounts). I suggest you put goldy, justcall and kingfisher on ignore.That cuts down the dialogue here to about 10 posts a day max which is probably all this company deserves at this point in its growth. Imagine a full day with only actual verifiable content and true question and answer dialogue without malice. it would be pretty quiet here.
I have gone ahead with this now. I always leave a long period for some plusses and minuses to appear and usually try and have some fun with it for awhile but pumpers get tiring in the end if they can't even mix it up a bit with even a sense of rational behaviour.
And in goodbye i say good luck to those threel. We all hope the company has future success. The road to success however does not need to be paved with blindl agreement and belief that everything is always perfect. The smartest and most successful talk about failure and defeat as badges of courage and insight and paths that lead to reaching higher. Don't expect you to buy into that though as the mind needs to be open to it.
I agree Pachu. Jose and I were starting a pertinent discussion about Generac. Not about which is better. My point which the three amigos don't get is companies and employees and fleets to install, maintain and answer customers needs by showing up.
ACDC doesnt at the moment. Do I hope they can? Yes. I have a position in ACDC. And am down right now. I'm not mad that I'm down. I'm mad at the bs that gets spewed with no factual base to it.
For example Goldy wants to talk PP. link it and explain in his/her expert opinion where it's at, what that point on the chart means. Where and why it will go and how either negative or positive it will affect share price.
That is factual, intellectual discussions. Full paragraph no spacing replies in 12 year old internet dialogue is partial evidence of a fraudster.
You're posting history (bemoaningly) is so long but with some time spent, and I have, on the date of your posts and the companies charts; lead me to my conclusion on you.
Your two buddies well; literally cognitively delayed.
I would love to read a good post by one of you. Like I said I'll put you on follow and look forward to your opinions and ideas.
Until then you simply are frauds.
Mr. Bryson, if he reads this at all, had opportunity to say "Hey good retail investors, please don't waste your money on this Sqaumish post. It is fictional. We have news coming in the near future but please protect yourselves and don't pay attention to this fraud."
Wow what a thing that could have been said by an ethical and moral business leader.
Mr. Bryson please stop the cheques sent to Goldy and his partners.