RE:RE:RE:RE:Wow, who turned on the lights?Ah yes, I was thinking of Dual Channel. My bad. My age must be showing too. Haha. Either way, this NR seems to me to be very suspicious. And why didn't the BOD stay on? They would have known about this. SMH.
leodevoe wrote: Actually no. Like many people,as they age, Yfi has had to reinvent itself. Wifi3 became MCSR which became spectrum slicing. I think you're thinking of Dual Channel, that useles tech that Cablelabs invented. I say useless because it has no use. Client devices still don't come with 2 radios which you need to make it work.
As for spectrum slicing I still chuckle when I see the name. They don't slice spectrum. They hoover up all the wifi channels then process them. You can't slicing anything when you're still just dealing with discrete channels. While it's only my opinion the reason they use the new moniker is because it's been a long discussed 5g concept. They are always trying to tie themselves to 5g, like they can offer something magic to wifi handoff. Which they can't. I also think they want to confuse people into thinking their tech has applications in 5g Which it doesn't
RoyallyScrewed wrote:
leodevoe wrote: Sorry RS you've missed the story here. There was no home test. For starters to put 750K units in homes would cost what $150 million at the bare bones minimum. Probably double that. It would have meant a company that has no chips needed 750K. The POC was a model. They didn't say that in the press release. Wonder why. Thing is Handy said it in a podcast months ago. Is this why the shares started moving pre halt in the US? Maybe. Possibly. And yes, if this was a thing the company would have been bought today. But as usual the deal is just around the corner. It always is.
Their Spectrum slicing is software. Couldn't the unknown servive provider have just downloaded the software to their devices and formatted the settings remotely? That's what I assumed.