RE:RE:RE:RE:Quick Factproph of no facts, Jenene
You need to come up with a new delivery, your continued spin on what you want the information to say is getting very old. I guess this is why you cannot be trusted.
Making the same statements over and over and over again are detracting fromt the story vs adding to it. Why? Because there are no results to speak of, there is no progress to speak of, there are no updates to speak of and you have a stock price that is down 30%.
So, let me see, why is the stock price down 30% from recent highs? Well, the negative sentiment is probablly the number one reason. Why is there negative sentiment? Because of a complete and utter lack of transparency. Number missed time lines and most importantly, the fact that the company conitnues to give shareholders the finger when they ask questions.
I do believe that anyone taking $600k in compensation from a publicly traded company should be held accountable for misses and failures. I don't mind praising Gilles Gagnon for the successes, which I have but poor performance needs to be explained. Once again prophet of no facts, we are missing the tranaparency side of the street.
It is too bad that your agenda is so severely misplaced and ignores the true reality of the situation. Even more ironic is that your stance and the company's are one of the same, that is clearly obvious to me. Just keep rehashing years old information without providing anything new. At about 135 days since the last real news release, this is unacceptable.
I have stated many times now that the information in the presentations is pretty much meaningless. There is no accountability behind it and the company cannot be held to account if it does not do what it says it is going to do. Why? It is called the "forward looking statements" disclaimer. No, I would rather see an actual news release vs a presentation. Yup, 135 days since any real news.
Ok, lets see how you want to spin this one, try and provide something creative and new this time around, you can do it.