RE:Approval for Testing vs Authorization for UseHey Smokey, I always appreciate your posts...they deal with business and are always courteous and professional...but, I have to point out that Therma doesn't 'just' need positive results...they are tesing for both...symptomatic and asymptomatic....in true primitive terms....they can literally stand in the same line as others being tested and 'mirror' their test results...for example...as 100 people get tested by nasal swab, do the same 100 tests with AcuVid and compare the data to eliminate false positives whilst still letting AcuVid perform at the same time...this would take literally a day to do and then have results from the nasal swabs within 24hrs to a week...but Therma would have the results in 15-20mins and be able to compare against the nasal swabs....all in all...24hrs to 1 week for 'comparitive' results...and they should speak for themselves...it would also be a way to sublty intorduce 'what's coming' (saliva tests) but more importantly...prove its effectiveness...
As much as I agree with just about eveything you have posted to date, it is clear Therma management dropped the ball on transparency for end of Dec and end of Feb testing....even in a court of law, you only have to create a seed of doubt to convict, or exonerate....
I will even take bad market conditions and month end tax selling, etc, etc, as excuses...but not being transparent on very key testing requirements and deadlines for a product that will 'save the world' so to speak...simply creates doubt....
I am still long and still hope but at this point, with proven testing of their procduct already in place via lab results....this is 'becomes' not rocket science...this preliminary 'leg-work' had, and should have been done already....and if there was a 'reason' that it couldn't be done...they needed to announce that...that's the dagger.....'doubt'...a deadly killer...
Please keep posting...