RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:This post is for the benefit of all Bullboard members. First, you think Yfi had a couple of hundred million dollars to build the equipment for the test? Ya that makes sense.
Second, the proof is the 4Front podcast. January 19. Scroll to 45:00.
You're welcome. And how is it baggies usually are the last to have any information? Good at what-ifs and possibilities. Lousy at due diligence.
THORZEUS2019 wrote: And where is your proof that it wasn't
leodevoe wrote: The myth is it was a live in home test. It wasn't.
THORZEUS2019 wrote:
leodevoe wrote: LOL. Sad Sam is back. As you know Scammy I stopped responding to your troll attempts long ago. But what the heck why not hold a one day moratorium on responding to your trash and have some fun.
The Kuiper (love the Amazon shout out) is the definition of arcane. Also, he's repetitive, untruthful, and most egregious, boring. His posts are dreadful. Every time I see the word breeds I think about dogs.
My wifi. I'm able to waste this time because I am finished configuring my new Ubiquiti Dream Machine. Yes, the controller is configured, the firewall is optimized, the intrusion detection/intrusion prevention is up and running and I have my 3 VLAN's in full operation. I measure 800+ Mbps in every corner of my house. It's massive overkill but if you pay for a GB connection then you might as well have a solution that can use it. Plus, my iPhone apps update really fast. Oh it's all powered through ceiling mounted PoE AP's on each floor. It's really very impressive Spammy. But I'm sure you're a big fan of your ISP modem.
On to the myth. A classic example of you not being able to understand what you read. As I stated clearly the scummy pumpers are perpetuating a myth that the POC was a live in home test. It wasn't. Hence myth. Hope that clears it up.
On to the blatant lie. There was no reported validation of the test by a third party. You just made that up. Cuz you're a liar.
Next, the tier one was happy to let Yfi report the results. Strange they weren't letting them use their name. I have no idea why not, but, why not? I know you and yours will posit the company wants to keep it quiet but that's of course ridiculous. The whole world knows the deal so it's not protecting a competitive advantage.
SamDiego wrote: Leo, if you find the time to scroll back through your numerous conversations employing different usernames you might discover Kuipers previous handle.
Also, I find it revealing that you would voluntarily demean your understanding of tech by describing Kuipers post as arcane. Maybe you should repost the high tech article of how you single handedly created the worlds best residential wifi set up from your lab in your basement.
Please clarify for this forum in what context you describe the POC as being a "myth"? Would this be the same as Nadler calling antifa a myth? Besides Leo, YFI was only a comparable participant in a test conducted by a Tier 1 service provider with the results measured by an assigned 3rd party. If the Tier 1 was satisfied enough to allow YFI announce the highlights of the results and you disagree, take your beef to their door. P.S. And be sure to bring along the data on your home wifi system.
leodevoe wrote: LOL. You're back again. Pity I can't remember your previous handle. Are you going to blather on with your arcane tech talk. If so, maybe this time you can make a relevant point. As for the truth maybe discuss the gaslighting by the usual sad crew. Currently they are focussed on the myth that Yfi did an actual in home test across 750K households. Call that out dipsh!t.
How do you dispute the news release.. It states..t
he Proof of Concept compared the current physical layer single-channel architecture offered by ALL today’s Wi-Fi systems, up to and including WiFi6E, to Edgewater’s patented, physical layer multi-channel Spectrum Slicing. The Proof of Concept was carried out on 750,000 homes with over 6-million devices. Results were outstanding and demonstrated: Why do you call it a myth