RE:RE:proconThe procon situation is interesting.....we have a mine builder who owns a good chunk of us so anyone who has servered as a director on a board of directors would understand the influence the board or a board member has on the direction of a company. It would be interesting to understand the influence of Yurkowski on and to the BOD, there are several board members that know squat about mining and development. Let's face if if there was going to be a mine you would think there would be desire by procon to do it .....I know what I would try to do if I was in the same position any any one out side the board would see the same thing ....much like I think probably some see with yurkowski .....any information and outsider puts on the table is going to feed procon and whit that alone there could be some negatives .....complete speculation on my part but have wondered this for some time.
the facts are clear all around us that we have never been in a better position to advance the FT story and the Pros far outweigh the Cons.....once this processing situation is resolved the picture is complete in that much ( and a critical part) of the risk of the critical path planning is done and we will be even far more attractive ...in the end, how procon influences this will be interesting .....it could also be that they have been ever critical to the board in terms of ways and means the plan advanced ...is what I would like to believe ...good things to come stay long.