RE:RE:RE:Just WonderingHoward46,
My first thought after reading your post was"What a great idea!"
After a few minutes though I changed my mind .... for a couple of reasons.....
First and foremost, the answers you get would likely be at one end of the scale or the other. This company has a tendency to bring that out in their shareholders. So by default there would be no "concensus" opinion.
Secondly I really think the exercise is somewhat redundant in the sense that Mr. Market, which is the ultimate arbitor of this sort of thing continues to tell each and every shareholder that management, and by default, this company deserves no better than a "2" across the board.
Moreover if the assessment is based on company projections and promises versus basic analysis using profit and lost statements or balance sheets, then this would probably be negative.
Each and every time Mr. Market rendered a positive outlook on good old DYA correlates nicely to a well timed press release extolling the virtues/ merits of the latest ,award, order, collaboration, appointment, or capital raise.
And of course as you would expect, when none of these ever amount to a hill of beans in terms of the true metrics, the stock slowly sinks back to its usual status.
The only thing keeping this latest reflation alive is the amount of money they raised on the back of 1 investor and the last set of fictional events from 2019 and the two "trials" from 2020.
But please don't share this expression of realism with our true savior and his several disciples that are now in year 7 and nealry $40 million of other peoples money in to this drama.