RE:RE:Re: Fortune is in year 23This and other examples only go to show the utter farce of the Revenue-Virginius mine purchase. The reality is that a small percentage of all potential mines are ever built and even then fluctuating prices, especially for base metals, puts many out of business even after production has been established. The Revenue mine is a joke and only numbskulls would every invest in this 140 yr old hole in the wall. ProCon and its majority owners in China and very sharp cookies. Unless I missed it, nowhere in the 2014/2015 FT news releases did I ever see a reference to Procon getting contracts for the rehabilitation of the Revenue mine. Which is very peculiar given that Procon spent millions on the purchase and is a bona fide expert in mine rehab. Since the beginning of 2014, when Procon was a major FT shareholder, the number of FT shares outstanding has tripled. I doubt Procon is a major shareholder now. It is worth noting that Aurcana, the current mine owners are spending an additional 40 million, including 5 million to upgrade the never commissioned underground mill, to bring R-V to production. How did Procon miss this? Did Procon not do any due diligence on the mine site and realize FT's planned funding was woefully inadequate? There is a bridge in Brooklyn waiting for you, should you buy into any of this grand rope a dope.