RE:RE:RE:RE:NASH partnership Yes you are right. But I really think they could be at the same place without the bought deal dont you think the same way ? And with that visibility increasing, they could have sign something better couple months later. But ok ok ok I get it. They were not willing to "gamble" and they may had to face something that we dont know. At some point I reconsidered TH's confidence for their own pipeline and products. But Paul, as any other CEO, seem very optimistic which is good of course. I know I keep going circle. But again, if you are so confident about your future, why not wait a little bit more for such deal ? Like if they really wanted to keep the SP low for another few months. Anyway... Soooooo lets be caution and wait for quarter after quarter's results and status/news about NASH and Oncology. Maybe one day we have the chance to understand what was the real rush and maybe we would have done the samething if were in their own shoes.
FredTheVoice wrote: Analia, we all need spring fast and sweet, still want you in my foursome......
Yes, I care about bad moves and impact on sharholders, I am one of them,
But still think that TH did the right move, giving some visibility with that bought deal. Sounds strange, but Th was out of the radar, now more visible, and cash in place to start both protocols.
Maybe not an "hole in one" before summer, but....
Cheers,
FTV.