Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by rockport1on Mar 11, 2021 11:40am
110 Views
Post# 32772804

RE:RE:RE:SEA Tunnels

RE:RE:RE:SEA TunnelsYes, I agree with your take here. They will all benefit from some form of co-operative tunnel or transportation link.  As you state, the greater the value of the entire stable of camps, the higher the incentive for all parties involved.  

What does really change for SEA however, is that surely, they are now the ugly sister.  TC is now the younger, prettier one. Any suitors will be wooing her first, no?



Countrygent wrote: I believe there will be a potential tunnel route through TC - it’s not solid deposits.

SEA’s issue is finding the clear route.  There will be one.

I believe TC shareholders may be glossing over the access and ore handling issues for development of what might come at TC ... which may all have to be downhill and closer to the highway.  Wouldn’t ore movement capacity, and mill, staging, tailings, water, power all be more  economical done in tandem?  Which means more jobs, royalties, taxes and downstream economic activity for the Province.  In terms of leverage and negotiating power, I agree SEA being landlocked puts them in a weaker or perhaps better stated “discounted” negotiating position, first on just being that much farther away in dollar terms of longer access development, second on having to find and negotiate an access.  Exhibit A the Pretivm purchase - discounted value, but another asset for leverage for access.  The existing permission ... is a long shot.  They gambled that they could state they were having no negative impact on TC, they had insufficient basis to say so, and their nightmare scenario developed with valuable ore bodies right in their way.  

And they have a credibility issue now with all third parties.  But my own POV is the bigger, the more valuable TC becomes, the better for SEA and KSM.

Follow the money?

cg




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>