RE:It helps to read the footnotes in the technical reportsSo what are you saying Ganndolph? That there are no men in black, sneaking in with their cammo trucks under cover of night, stealthily loading up on that oh so valuable extremely high grade dirt and then discretely disappearing again, all so cunningly done that noone noticies? SO you mean the reason for the discrepancy would be that the new assessment of the stockpile was done using some slightly more cautious metrics as well as some of it used during the last years processing? Now you're starting to sound like a real conspiracy theorists, I mean beleiving in a simple explanation how crazy is that?
What would be great would be some clarifications from ORV comparing the old OSP stockpile assesemnt to the new one, explaining differences and we could all buy it or pose additional questions. I do hope Coop compiles his thoughts and runs it by ORV management and that they would make an official clarification so we could put speculations behind us. I don't think this forum has a big influence on share price, but the shear number of posts on this board throwing out back door theories would be good to have addressed as in the end it may scare of some potential investors which would be bad for them and bad for us. AND maybe we could get more of a dialog and information out of ORV which could definitely be supportive for share price.
Anyway, in the end, comming quarters' reports are going to set the directions, as long as we progress towards the OSP extraction, Orovalle continues to deliver and Taguas brings some nice exploration data, nothing of this buzz will matter much.