RE:RE:OLD FOX: QUESTION TXRogers wrote:
ronreagan wrote: Let's just assume for the sake of argument that you're right, TX was telling people It would be going to "da moon" when it was 7.00. OK great, so TX theoretically lost a bunch of money from there. QUESTION: Exactly how does that chain of events hurt YOU? Seems like to me you oughta feel sorry for TX, yet you continue to rub it in. Wanna explain?
Why assume anything?
Why not simply look back at the thread spanning the early days of the story , and towards where ES, KL, and Novo were moving the investment . With their investment, not mine.
No assumptions. Just read the full conversation and the associated links. It was not about moonshots. It was about trajectories, and limits to stock price in fact. On why Novo in those days could NOT be a moonshot.
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=v.nvo&postid=31442257
Read it for yourself. If you can understand it. There is no assumption in the subject matter. Only opinion.
Obviously the imbecile to which it is directed could not participate, due to an obviously limited intellect.
Tx
And not to give Oldfk a sustained hardon requiring pumps that would likely melt his crayons, the actual barriers that kept Novo stock prices from enjoying a moonshot trajectory are now gone.
The barriers disappeared along with the exit of Kirkland Lake.
So, I can't even imagine the dried $hit flying around the chart chimp cage these days.
Tx