TRUMP - TAITERNow Trump...
why go to such a length to basically state what i already addressed ?
If oyu apply the ( .0001 % ) per kg then multiply by 1000 to arriver at tonne
the answer is the same. ( lol )
Where exactly is the online calculator is a muff ?
They did not include ( grams ) which essentially tacks on another x 1000
to arrive at per tonne.
Simply revisit my post - andlook at the proving of hte math.
if the math reverse engineers with an absolute - then.. .the math is perfect.
ppm is apllied to kg -therefore - the percentages shold be changed when seeing a ppm
value of mineral on a junior stock.. any junior.
all they have to do is... state the ppm x q000 = gram / tonne.
simple...
Tairter...?
Are you referring to the core pic with gold that looks indifferent ?
Before i got into this stock - i looked at what others were saying...
And well.. . i simply imagined a photographer taking pics from one side of the core
then walking around and taking a pic from opposite side.
I tried my best ot visualize what the spec of gold would look like if the core was
photographed form opposite side.. .and well.. .with my eyes... it looked as if it would match.
One specof the gold - would have a slight smaller look all because of the angle.
THEN..... I scanned the drill core intercepts...
Tthis is why i'm owning - stock.,
I see potentilal with - good intercepts and grades. ( prelim )
I'm not hung up over a - spec of gold -
over a potential diff angle it was photographed on..
I prefer drill =l intercepts + grades.
Such... reveals the larger picture.
Just my own opinion.
Not investment advice.
anf hs