RE:RE:Sort of competitorDon't know if they have of course but I think that sort of thinking that (I paraphrase) "yeah we tested and confirmed our assumptions" is substandard. Better is : "hey, we monitor regardless" - which is what the Biocloud does. So if you take the first approach and assuming your break room is safe and then you have an outbreak that could have been avoided - well, you should have gone with the Biocloud.
What gets me is that it is so similar in concept, just not as complete in operation as the bio cloud. And it reminds me of a story I read from early 2020 out of sweden (maybe somewhere else) but the gist was they were near development of an airborne detector but what was lacking was the abiltiy to draw in and process the air. Well well. And get this - someone over at CEO says that Thermo Fisher may be connected somehow with CEMSI ( a customer? .... intriguing).
I think it is great that a far cheqper and far less effective alternative is out there. It highlights the value of and justifies the expense of the Biocloud.