RE:RE:Inside OwnershipThat's quite something. Needless to say, they won't be acquired unless they want to be acquired. Not many smallcaps have the freedom to dicate terms the way these guys do. Personally, the company and the planet are better off if they keep this in-house so they can spread the benefits far and wide over the years to come.
Dumont wrote: I suggest insiders own in excess of 60%. Just Hubbard, Tingley and Stein own over 50% collectively, and the Board and employees must hold at least 10% or more( all figures taken from insiders report as per Stockhouse).
And, more importantly, they all keep acquiring more stock, and have for many years.